From the following select box, choose language of your preference:

UGC Approved Course for Indian Universities

Learning objectives

E-Learning Course for Undergraduates

Subject : Philosophy B.A._Part 1

Topic : Elements of Indian Philosophy
Course module no.9:
Samkara Advaita Vedanta                          

Topic 1: Nature of Brahman

Lecture : 3:1

by:

Devasia M. Antony Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy Hindu College, University of Delhi

Course content based on model syllabus of: University Grant Commission

Background

This Lecture Series in Audio, Video, Text, alongwith objectives, References, case study, Assignment, Discussion, FAQs, Quiz has been developed by World Development Foundation, as a sample for the NME-ICT plan of MHRD India.

Please send your feedback.

Please also contact us for getting developed e-learning packages.We can develop for you such packages for any type of formal or non-formal/ vocational courses with the help of University Professors and experts.

Course Coordinator

Prof. Dr. H. O. Srivastava

Lesson-1

Nature of Brahman

Course module no. 9: Samkara Advaita Vedanta
Topic 1: Nature of Brahman

Course Description & Objective

The objective of this course is to equip students with the fundamental concepts underlying the Elements of Indian Philosophy to prepare for the Course module no. 9: Samkara Advaita Vedanta,Topic 1: Nature of Brahman for B.A.Part 1. Philosophy (Honours) Course. After going through this lesson, the students should be able to understand the following topics:

1. The metaphysical notion of ultimate reality

2. Samkara’s criterion: non-sublatability (trikala-abadhitvam)

3. Analysis of the human experience of causal relation (cause-effect)

Text of the Course

The course discusses the Elements of Indian Philosophy based primarily on the teachings of Adi Shankaracharya (meaning ‘the first Shankara’ in his lineage), reverentially called Bhagavatpada Acharya (the teacher at the feet of Lord). The Indian philosophy talks about the quality of life and not the quantity of life. Basically this course deals with the Nature of Brahman or in other words the reality or satyam-that which is. The lecture briefly covers the following topics:

The metaphysical notion of ultimate reality

Samkara’s criterion: non-sublatability (trikala-abadhitvam)

Analysis of the human experience of causal relation (cause-effect):

What is real?
Adi Shankara says that the world is not real (true), it is an illusion. Whatever thing remains eternal is true, and whatever is non-eternal is untrue. Since the world is created and destroyed, it is not real(true). Further change of form does not mean change in reality; form or quality not distinct from substance. Truth is the thing which is unchanging. A real object should be non-contradictable or non-subletable or abadhitvam.It means a real thing can not be destroyed or cancelled in any situation. Change (parinama) is rationally untenable, it is an appearance (vivartavada) (Satkaryavada>Vivartavada>Brahma-vivartvada). Since the world is changing, it is not real (true). Whatever is independent of space and time is real, and whatever has space and time in itself is real. When we are sleeping we see a dream which apears to be real. The world is compared to this conscious dream. The world is believed to be a superimposition of the Brahman. At the same time Indian philosophy beleives that the world is not absolutely unreal(false). The world cannot be both true and false at the same time; hence Adi Shankara has classified the world as indescribable.

The Soul

Existence alone is common to all objects, both physical and mental. The soul or the self (Atman) is identical with Brahman. It is not a part of Brahman that ultimately dissolves into Brahman, but the whole Brahman itself. Atman is only one and unique. Indeed Atman alone is Ekaatma Vaadam.Consciousness is present in every appearance of existence.

Cause and Effect (Karya-karana ananyatva)

Advaita states that karya (effect) is non-different from karana (cause). However karana is different from karya. This principle is called Karya-karana ananyatva (the non-difference of the effect from the cause). In another words, the effect is non-different from the cause (Satkarya-vada versus Asatkarya-vada). If the cause is destroyed, the effect will no longer exist. Despite the non-difference of cause and effect, the effect has its self in the cause but not the cause in the effect. The effect is of the nature of the cause and not the cause the nature of the effect. Therefore the qualities of the effect cannot touch the cause. All names and forms are real when seen with the Sat (Brahman) but are false when seen independent of Brahman. This way Advaita establishes the non-difference of effect from cause. Jagat (the world) is not different from Brahman; however Brahman is different from Jagat.
Brahman

God, the Supreme Cosmic Spirit or Brahman is the One, the whole and the only reality. Other than Brahman, everything else, including the universe, material objects and individuals, are false. Pure existence is the common unchanging, eternal, the absolute reality behind all forms, external and internal. Brahman or Existence as such is un-contradictable and therefore supremely real. Existence is self-revealing consciousness as well. Brahman is at best described as that infinite reality that is the divine ground of all Being.. Brahman is not the effect of the world. Brahman is said to be the purest knowledge itself, and is illuminant like a source of infinite light.

Coverage in the video

The fundamental metaphysical conception that serves as the fulcrum in the Advaita Vedanta of Sankara (c.788-820 CE) is that of the ultimate reality denoted by the word ‘Brahman’. A little reflection on the significance of the totality of human experience – such as deep experiences of joy and suffering and indifference- shows that the philosophical category of the ‘metaphysical’ is not a complete negation of the ‘physical’ but rather trans-figuring the ‘physical’ by asking the most pivotal philosophical question: what is reality?; Am I (are we) and my (our) experiences real? The recent air crash at Mangalore would force us to ask such a question, however disturbing and agonising it may be.

Before one explores the philosophical construction of the nature of reality -‘that which is’- it is important to take note of the criterion of reality. In this connection, Sankara introduces the notion of ‘abadhitvam’ which means non-contradict-ability or non-sublat-ability as the true mark of reality. It means that which exists at all times is that which is supremely real. Advaita means non-duality and Sankara claims that Brahman alone is the ultimate reality.

Sankara in a significant sense takes note of the duality or plurality of our embodied existence and raises the question of such experience being true and real. In this context he discusses the cause-effect theory called satkaryavada, and proposes what is called Brahma-vivarta-vada. It means that the duality or plurality that constitutes the very possibility of our experience is nothing but the apparently real modification of Brahman as the world and its objects. That means, in becoming the world, the Brahman does not really undergo any kind of transformation.

Analysing further our experience, Sankara claims that ‘existence’ alone – meaning existence as such, not any given object which is only the case of a particular instantiation of existence- is common to all objects both physical and mental that come within the ambit of all human experience. That means pure existence is the common reality behind all forms and this existence nothing but the self-revealing consciousness. Sankara comes to this conclusion after a careful and threadbare analysis of the ontological status of the self (the subject) and the other (the object) that necessarily constitute all our experience in the three-fold states of consciousness: the waking, the dream and the deep sleep state. Both the waking state and the dream state of consciousness are characterised by contradiction and sublation. But the deep sleep state of consciousness transcends the contradict-ability or sublat-ability of the waking as well as the dream state of consciousness. Sankara takes this to mean that Brahman or Existence as such is un-contradictable and therefore supremely real. That means persistence is the true nature of reality/Brahman and exclusion or sublation is the mark of that which is unreal. And the individual self or Atman is nothing but this non-dual Brahman, concludes Sankara.

Summary

The course discusses the Elements of Indian Philosophy based primarily on the teachings of Adi Shankaracharya (meaning ‘the first Shankara’ in his lineage), reverentially called Bhagavatpada Acharya (the teacher at the feet of Lord). The Indian philosophy talks about the quality of life and not the quantity of life. Basically this course deals with the Nature of Brahman or in other words the reality or satyam-that which is. Inquiry about the reality is the main theme of the Indian Philosophy. A real object should be non-contradictable or non-subletable or abadhitvam.It means a real thing can not be destroyed or cancelled in any situation. A body is destructable and so it can not be real. It is the soul, “I am” that is real or satya. This continues all through i.e. past, present and future. Therefore this is called trikala-abadhitvam. Further the philosophy deals with the effect and cause. The effect is non-different from the cause (Satkarya-vada versus Asatkarya-vada). They both are closely related.

Change (parinama) is rationally untenable, it is an appearance (vivartavada) (Satkaryavada>Vivartavada>Brahma-vivartvada). Sankara talked of Annanya. Change of form does not mean change in reality. The form or quality is not distinct from substance. Brahman or Existence as such is un-contradictable and therefore supremely real.

The philosophy and teachings of Adi Sankaracharya were based on the Advaita Vedanta. He preached ‘Non-Dualism’. It means that each and every person has a divine existence, which can be identified with the Supreme God. The mere thought that human being is finite with a name and form subject to earthly changes, is to be discarded. The bodies are diverse, but the soul of all the separate bodies is the same, the Divine One.

References

Basic Reading:

1. Satischandra Chatterjee and Dhirendramohan Datta, An Introduction to Indian Philosophy (Chapter X), University of Calcutta, Calcutta, 1984. First published 1939.

2. Chandradhar Sharma, A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy (Chapter XV), Motilal Banasidass, Delhi,1987. First published 1952.

3. M. Hiriyanna. Outlines of Indian Philosophy (Chapter XIII), Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited, Delhi 1994. First published 1932.

Advanced Reading:

1. Karl H. Potter (ed) Advaita Vedanta up to Samkara and His Pupils (Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Volume III), Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited, Delhi, 1998. First published 1981.

2. Surendranath Dasgupta, A History of Indian Philosophy, Volume I (Chapter X), Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited, Delhi, 2004. First published 1922.

3. S. Radhakrishnan, Indian Philosophy, Volume 2 (Chapter VIII), Oxford University Press, Delhi, 1998. First published 1923.

4. Sinha, H. P., Bharatiya Darshan ki ruparekha (Features of Indian Philosophy), 1993, Motilal Benarasidas, Delhi-Varanasi.

5. Karl H. Potter (ed.), Advaita Vedanta up to Sankara and his Pupils: Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, vol. 3, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1981.

6. A. Ramamurti, Advaitic mysticism of Sankara, Visvabharati, Santiniketan, 1974.

7. Kapil N. Tiwari, Dimensions of renunciation in Advaita Vedanta, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, 1977.

8. ” Kokileswar Sastri, An introduction to Adwaita philosophy: a critical and systematic exposition of the Sankara school of Vedanta, Bharatiya Publishing House, Varanasi, 1979.

9. Satyapal Verma, Role of Reason in Sankara Vedanta, Parimal Publication, Delhi, 1992.

10. Arvind Sharma, The philosophy of religion and Advaita Vedanta: a comparative study in religion and reason, Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.

Case Study

Adi Sankara was an Indian philosopher who consolidated the doctrine of Advaita Vedanta, the most influential sub-school of Vedanta. His teachings are based on the unity of the soul and Brahman, in which Brahman is viewed as without attributes. Shankara established the doctrine of Advaita (No dualism). . It means that each and every person has a divine existence, which can be identified with the Supreme God. Wise Man, in the greatness of his knowledge and spiritual discrimination, Sees the Self as the only reality and thinks, ‘I am Brahman’. Only Brahman is Real. The Jiva or the individual soul is non-different from Brahman. The world is not an illusion according to Sankara. The world is relatively real (Vyavaharika Satta), while Brahman is absolutely real (Paramarthika Satta). The unchanging Brahman appears as the changing world because of a superimposition of non- Self (objects) on Self (subject – Brahman). This is called Avidya. Now we proceed to do a case study by comparing some of the quotes from Gita which was said to have been spoken by Lord Krishana, an embodiment of Brhahman.

According to Sankara, avidya is the basis of all that we know and do in our empirical life. It is the root cause of our bondage. And so in order to put an end to our bondage and attain liberation, ignorance (avidya) which is the root cause has to be destroyed; and ignorance can be destroyed only by attaining the right knowledge of the Self, discriminating it from the not-Self. In the words of Sankara,”Knowledge is the means by which Brahman realization is desired to be attained. Brahman-realization is the highest end of man since it destroys the root of all evil such as avidya, the seed of the entire samsara.”

Sankara’s Commentary on Brahma-Sutra, 1-1-1

In Gita, Sri Krishna says: “In the world a two fold path was taught by me, 0 sinless one: that of the Sankhyas by devotion to knowledge, and that of the Yogins by devotion to action.”

“The knower of Brahman attains the highest”.

Frequently asked Questions

Q.Indian philosophy (Sanskrit: Darshanas)

Ans. Indian philosophy (Sanskrit: Darshanas) refer to any of several traditions of philosophical thought that originated in the Indian subcontinent, including Hindu philosophy, Buddhist philosophy, and Jain philosophy.

Q. What is Advaita?

Ans. Advaita literally means “non duality.” Its first great consolidator was Adi Shankaracharya (788-820), who continued the line of thought of some of the Upanishadic teachers, and that of his teacher’s teacher Gaudapada. By analysing the three states of experience—–waking, dreaming, and deep sleep—–he established the singular reality of Brahman, in which the soul and Brahman are one and the same.

Q. What is Metaphysics?

Ans. Metaphysics is a branch of philosophy that investigates principles of reality transcending those of any particular science. It is concerned with explaining the fundamental nature of being and the world.

Q. What is the Vedanta in Indian philosophy?

Ans. The term “Vedanta” has the literal meaning “the end of the Veda” and refers both to the teaching of the Upanishads , which constitute the last section of the Veda , and to the knowledge of its ultimate meaning.

 

Philosophy Quizzes

Course module no. 9: Samkara Advaita Vedanta
Topic 1: Nature of Brahman

You have learnt about:

1. The metaphysical notion of ultimate reality

2. Samkara’s criterion: non-sublatability (trikala-abadhitvam)

3. Analysis of the human experience of causal relation (cause-effect)

Now take the quizzes to qualify

%d bloggers like this: